Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chircop v. City of Pontiac

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1961No. Docket 44, Calendar 49,087PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1DissentBlack, J.

This is a taxpayers’ suit, brought against the defendant city and city manager. Tbe bill * asks an accounting of “all receipts and disbursements of automobile parking district No. 1 up to tbe present time and that defendants be ordered to make such adjustment in the accounts as may be required to permit compliance with ordinance No 1292.” Tbe salient aim of tbe bill is to restrain tbe city from “diverting” portions of its general funds to support tbe sagging revenues of a municipal parking project which, by resolution of tbe city commission and referred vote of tbe electors, was established…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McManus v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Peoples Savings Bank v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christie v. BD. OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY REGENTSMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Christie v. BD. OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY REGENTSMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API