State v. Brown
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Frank R. Brown was convicted of having carnal knowledge of a female between thirteen and eighteen years of age. He appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of having had carnal knowledge of a female under the age of eighteen years and over the age of thirteen years, which, under our statute, is a felony. He appeals from the judgment.
The first error assigned relates to statements made by the prosecutrix while testifying as a witness for the state. Though it were assumed that the statements were objectionable, yet, no objection or exception having been interposed or taken to the statements, the assignment is not reviewable by us.
At the trial the prosecutrix, a girl of about fourteen years of age, but…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Klopenstine v. HaysUtah Supreme Court · 1899
- Arwood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Harper v. State ex rel. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Rains v. BallowIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Trimble Et Ux. v. Union Pacific StagesUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.