Legal Opinion

Weeks v. Coe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

These are cross-motions to dismiss appeals taken -by each party herein. The action was tried before a- referee, and the plaintiff, securing a favorable report, entered judgment thereon. After the entry of judgment the defendant duly appealed therefrom. Subset quently he made- a ¡notion for a new trial Upon affidavits setting forth newly:discovered' evidence. This motion was ■ granted upon payfnent of the-costs of the trial and certain other' specified items. Thereafter and on October 29, 1898, the defendant entered an order in the clerk’s office of the county of Westchester, bearing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of the N.Y. Cen. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Hewitt v. . City MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Goetz v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Lauritzen v. H. L. Judell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People ex rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Goetz v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. McCordic v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API