Legal Opinion
George M. Jones Co. v. Canadian Nat. Ry. Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 4, 1926No. 7451PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the George M. Jones Company, an Ohio corporation, against certain railroad companies, constituting and known as the Grand Trunk Railway System (which will be hereinafter referred to as the defendant), to recover approximately $57,00,0- alleged to be due, for principal and interest, as the unpaid balance of the purchase price of approximately 150,000 tons of coal sold and delivered by plaintiff to the defendant under a written contract as later modified. A jury has been waived by the parties in the statutory manner, and the cause heard by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Denver & R. G. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Equitable Trust Co. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- New York Trust Co. v. Detroit, T. & I. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Mather v. StokelyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915
- Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co. v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Surety Co. v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Jones v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Butte A. & P. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Sagamore Iron Co. v. Ash Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Merinos Viesca y Compania, Inc. v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931