Little v. Schul
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
In March, 1912, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore passed Ordinance Ho. 87, appointing two constables for each of the wards of the City, except the eighth and twelfth wards, for each of which only one constable was appointed, one constable for each of said wards having been previously appointed.
By that ordinance, which was approved by the Mayor on the 19th of March, 1912, the appellee, William E. Schul, and James Barnes were appointed constables for the first ward for two years from the date of its passage. The appellee had been a constable for sixteen years, and had always qualified…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Thomas v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Anderson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
- White v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Levin v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- County Commissioners v. MonnettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Gould v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.