Harp Advertising Illinois, Inc. v. Village of Chicago Ridge, Illinois
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Harp Advertising wants to erect a billboard in Chicago Ridge, Illinois. Portions of the village’s zoning code got in the way; so did provisions of its sign code. Harp filed this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, contending that the ordinances violate the first amendment, applied to states (and villages) by the fourteenth. Magistrate Judge Lefkow recommended that the district court declare the sign code unconstitutional but sustain the zoning code; before the district court could act, Chicago Ridge repealed the challenged provisions of the sign code. The district judge…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- CAMP Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- LAMAR ADVERTISING OF PENN, LLC, — CROSS-APPELLEE v. TOWN OF ORCHARD PARK, NEW YORK, —Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Midwest Media Property, L.L.C v. Symmes TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- James A. McNAMARA, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City Of Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.