Legal Opinion

Worthington v. Moon

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Bird, V. C.

On the 29th day of April, 1893, the defendants in this case conveyed to the complainant about twenty-six acres of land. In the deed was the following stipulation :

The said premises are also conveyed with the understanding that the said party of the first part may remain in possession of them until the first day of April, eighteen hundred and ninety-four, and during that time may dig clay thereon as they have been doing, and in the same field, and may remove the *47same for their own use without charge therefor, and also that the said party of the first part may remove all unused posts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Livingston v. TompkinsNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  2. Meigs's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  3. Baxter v. LansingNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  4. Hughson v. HughsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  5. Stevens v. BeekmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1814

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. HobanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Brown's Mills Land Co., Inc. v. Pemberton Twp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API