Temple v. Abercrombie
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING ACTION
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action challenges the constitutionality of Hawaii’s Civil Unions Law, 2011 Haw. Sess. L. Act 1 (“Act 1”) codified at Hawaii Revised Statutes (“HRS”) Ch. *1027572B (the “Civil Unions Law”), which became effective on January 1, 2012. Plaintiffs Emmanuel Temple, the House of Praise (“Emmanuel Temple”); Carl E. Harris (“Harris”); Lighthouse Outreach Center Assembly of God; and Joe Hunkin, Jr. (“Hunkin”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed the action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use CommissionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
- J.P. v. Ernesto Santacruz Jr. et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2025