Legal Opinion

Davis v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 10, 1936No. [No. 44, April Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The allegations of the amended bill of complaint in this case are to the following effect:

Prior to December 8th, 1926, A. Berkenfeld was the holdér in due course of a promissory note for $388, maturing on that date, signed by Louis Harris, one of the present defendants. Payment of the note having been demanded and refused, suit thereon was instituted on January 8th, 1927, resulting in a judgment, entered on January 29th, 1927, which is now held by the plaintiff in this litigation as assignee. When demand for the payment of the note was made at its maturity, and on numerous later occasions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stieff Co. v. UllrichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Hertz v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Nimmo v. BlickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ShoulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Citizens National Bank v. LefflerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API