Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jefferson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1998No. 98-757PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Absent any mitigating circumstances, the penalty for ignoring orders of the court and continuing to practice law while under suspension is disbarment. Disciplinary Counsel v. Chavers (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 441, 687 N.E.2d 415, and cases cited therein. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChaversOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. JeffersonOhio Supreme Court · 1998