Legal Opinion
Fosket v. State Board of Dentistry
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1977No. Docket 77-1763, 77-1795PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.
Plaintiffs are licensed dental hygienists who are regulated by defendant, the Michigan State Board of Dentistry. Defendant is charged with the exclusive power to supervise, license and examine the overall practice of dentistry in the State of Michigan pursuant to MCLA 338.201 et seq.; MSA 14.629(1) et seq.
On July 8, 1976, plaintiffs commenced an action in Oakland County Circuit Court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under GCR 1963, 521, to prevent the defendant from supervising, licensing and examining dental hygienists.
Count I of plaintiffs’ complaint contends that dental hygiene is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Kambas v. St. Joseph's Mercy Hosp. of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Cooke Contracting Co. v. Department of State Highways 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Berry v. Board of Governors of the Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Bridgman v. KochSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Berry v. Board of Governors of the Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980