People v. Prashad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court correctly denied his application challenging the prosecutor’s use of a peremptory challenge against a prospective juror of Indian heritage (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). The prosecutor’s use of one challenge against the single person of Indian heritage on the venire, without more, did not establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination (see People v Taylor, 288 AD2d 331; People v Franklin, 287 AD2d 649; People v Hinton, 285 AD2d 476). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the application without the need for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. CottoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. ArmisteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. HintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. RuffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. HaskinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.