Legal Opinion

Edison Co. v. Street Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Aepeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. J. L. Camp.

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by the appellee, J. W. Dixon, against the appellant and the San Antonio Street Railway Company, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon him by the concurrent negligence of the two companies. The acts of negligence averred are embodied in our conclusions of fact.

The San Antonio Edison Company, answered, first, by general demurrer; second, by special exceptions; third, by general denial; fourth, that the alleged defective pole, by the breaking of which Dixon was injured, was the property of its codefendant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. SeinTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. CongdonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bowers v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. Hawthorne, Washington Territory1888
  5. Johnson v. Ches. & Ohio R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hovey v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. San Antonio Gas & Electric Co. v. OconTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Corby v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Wilson v. Valley Improvement Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API