Pierce v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Victoria. Tried below before-Hon. James C. Wilson. Appeal from a conviction for forgery; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The charging part of the indictment is set out in the opinion, as also-the grounds of the motion in arrest of judgment attacking its sufficiency..
1Opinion of the Court
HEUDERSOU, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his; punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years;, hence this appeal.
A number of bills of exception were reserved to the failure of the court, to charge certain phases of the case insisted on by appellant. A motion was also made in arrest of judgment, which was overruled, and a bill of exceptions reserved to this action of the court. As all of these exceptions-hinge on the indictment, we will state the charging part of the same, to-wit: That the said A. P. Pierce “did then and there, without lawful authority,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Landrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Collum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913