Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shippen v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 17, 1981No. 281-79CPublished

1DissentKashiwa, Judge

The majority, it seems to me, decides this case by simply fastening a label of "declaratory judgment” on the second counterclaim. Since United States v. King, 395 U. S. 1 (1969), speaks ill of declaratory judgments when sought by plaintiffs against the sovereign, it must follow, says the majority, that we cannot entertain a "declaratory judgment” when sought by the Government. Yet the sovereign is immune from suit save its consent, e.g., United States v. *144Sherwood, 312 U. S. 584, 586 (1941), and even a cursory reading discloses that proposition to be the sine qua non of the King decision.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. McElrath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API