Legal Opinion

Bowery Savings Bank v. Nosmo Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

The petitioner, Frederick Construction and Engineering Company, has a lien junior to a second mortgage of defendant Roth on premises 15 West Thirty-first street, which are the subject of this foreclosure action. The second mortgage covers also property on One Hundred and Seventieth street in The Bronx. The petitioner asks that the distribution of the proceeds of the Thirty-first street foreclosure in a surplus-money proceeding be stayed until he can prosecute a suit in equity to compel Roth to foreclose on the Bronx property and marshal the securities.

In Quackenbush v. O’Hare (129 N. Y. 485)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quackenbush v. . O'HareNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowery Savings Bank v. Nosmo Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API