Legal Opinion

In re Rushfield

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1998No. 96-BG-272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent Mark C. Rushfield entered a guilty plea to three misdemeanor counts charging willful violations of 29 U.S.C. § 1131 relating to ERISA reporting requirements. The Supreme Court of New Jersey reprimanded respondent, and subsequently the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, issued a public censure as reciprocal discipline.

Advised of these actions, we entered an order referring the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility for a recommendation whether identical, greater, or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline, or whether the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re RamacciottiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re KrounerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API