Legal Opinion
Caffery v. Stillman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 2, 2003No. AC 23512PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*193 Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Martin S. Stillman, the plaintiff, Robert B. Caffery, claims that the trial court improperly determined that his claims were barred by the statute of limitations and that he was collaterally estopped from asserting claims that could have been raised in an allied workers’ compensation claim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history and factual background are germane to our discussion of the issues on appeal. On April 16,1992, the plaintiff sustained injuries in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DeNigrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Hill v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Faigel v. Fairfield UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alexandru v. StrongConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Margolin v. Kleban and Samor, PCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Weiner v. ClintonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Pelletier v. GalskeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Tatum v. ObergDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.