Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Pennsylvania Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1916No. Appeal, No. 137PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 137, Oct. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1913, No. 297, on verdict for plaintiff in case of William J. Donnelly v. Pennsylvania Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear in the following opinion, of Shaper, P. J., sur defendant’s motion for á new trial and for judgment n. o. v.: The action is for the loss of a leg caused by being run over by a car when the plaintiff was boarding a train.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 137, Oct. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1913, No. 297, on verdict for plaintiff in case of William J. Donnelly v. Pennsylvania Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear in the following opinion, of Shaper, P. J., sur defendant’s motion for á new trial and for judgment n. o. v.: The action is for the loss of a leg caused by being run over by a car when the plaintiff was boarding a train. The plaintiff’s testimony is to the effect that he went to the station at Rochester, Pennsylvania, to board a train; that…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below denying defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v., and refusing a new trial.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Decker v. KuleszaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Wilson v. KallenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Pritts v. WigleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Glaister v. Eazor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API