Legal Opinion

Benson v. Hodgdon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 24, 2010No. 09-076PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. This ancient roads case stems from a declaratory judgment by the Windsor Superior Court in favor of the Town of Royalton and plaintiffs Ronald Benson, Betty Benson, Barry Benson and Edith Benson, affirming the existence of an old town highway across defendants’ and plaintiffs’ land. Defend ants Perry Hodgdon and Carol Hodgdon 1 appeal this finding on the grounds that (1) the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proof as to the existence and location of the road; (2) the Town had abandoned the road through disuse and defendants now hold title through adverse possession; and (3) the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. GillespieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Graves v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  3. In Re Mattison's PetitionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  4. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. LysobeySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Capital Candy Company v. SavardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Town Highway No. 20Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. Montgomery v. Brinver Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  3. C. Paige Hinkson v. Stuart StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  4. Hannah P. Sachs v. Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC and Caryn Waxman, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. Frances Nesti v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API