Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vega v. 103 Thayer Street, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 2013Published

1Dissent

Andrias, J.P., and Freedman, J.,

dissent in a memorandum by Andrias, J.E, as follows: Plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries she allegedly sustained when she tripped and fell as a result of a hole on the pedestrian ramp located at the northeast corner of Broadway and Thayer Street. The City moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff could not prove prior written notice to the City as required under Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7-201 (c) (2) because the Big Apple map received by the Department of Transportation (DOT) *406on October 23, 2003 did not indicate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roldan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. D'Onofrio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Belmonte v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API