Legal Opinion
Holtzer-Cabot Electric Co. v. Standard Electric Time Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 29, 1939No. 4571PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
This suit involves infringement of a patent, United States patent No. 1,793,-846, granted to one Vernon Durbin, February 24, 1931, and admittedly owned by the plaintiff. The defendant in its answer asserts non-infringement and invalidity of the patent. Claims 1 and 5 only, of the patent, are in suit.
Statements of facts in this opinion may be taken as special findings, and statements as to the law, as legal conclusions, in compliance with Rule 52 of the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
According to the patent, it relates to an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holtzer-Cabot Electric Co. v. Standard Electric Time Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940