State v. Hartung
Supreme Court of Minnesota
' Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Martin county charged with the crime of seditious teaching contrary to the statute forbidding interference with enlistments in the military or naval service of the government or of the state while this country was at war with Germany, tried in the district court for that county, before Dean, J,, and a jury and found guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted by the verdict of a jury of violating the provisions of section 3, c. 463, p. 765, Laws of 1917. From an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appealed.
The indictment charges, in substance, that the defendant, on June 5, 1918, at the village of Welcome, Martin county, Minnesota, did wilfully and unlawfully teach and advocate by oral speech that the citizens of this state should not aid or assist the United States in prosecuting or ear-*129rying on the wax with Germany in which it was engaged, by saying to and in the presence of one G. W.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State v. GilbertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State v. TownleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State v. KaercherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918