DeVall v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
This workmen’s compensation case presents the question of whether petitioner Edith DeVall was an employee within the meaning of the Arizona Workmen’s Compensation Act, A.R.S. § 23-901 et seq. and, thus, entitled to benefits for an injury suffered while she was cleaning the swimming pool at Villa Del Sol Motel, respondent employer.
Respondent carried no workmen’s compensation insurance, so petitioner’s claim was initially processed by the Industrial Commission. It was denied and a hearing was held which resulted in an award finding that petitioner was not an employee of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Hughes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Ferrell v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Industrial Commission v. Farm & Home Food Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Avila v. Northrup King Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Flamingo Motor Inn v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Henderson-Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Avila v. Northrup King Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.