Legal Opinion

Shad v. Arnow

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 14, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, C. J.:

The appeal here is from order dismissing bill of complaint by which it was sought to enforce an alleged contractors lien against the owner on certain property.

The motion granted to dismiss the suit was based on the provisions of Sec. 84.04 sub-paragraph (3) Fla. Stats. 1941 (same F.S.A.) because contractor had not before institution of suit complied with the provisions of the statute, supra.

The decree must be affirmed on authority of Buker v. Webster, 140 Fla. 470, 191 So. 385, and Dodson v. Florida Nursery & Landscape Co., 138 Fla. 887, 190 So. 695.

Sections 84.29, 84.30 and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dodson v. Florida Nursery & Landscape Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Roberts v. Ebeneezer Wesleyan Methodist Church of West Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Emery v. International Glass & Mfg., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Hardee v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Surf Properties v. Markowitz Bros.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Broderick v. Overhead Door Co. of Fort Lauderdale, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  5. Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Joseph LangnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API