Legal Opinion

Rutz v. Esler & Ropiequet Mf'g Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Wm. H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

To the April term of the St. Clair Circuit Court suit was brought by appellee against appellant for the recovery of $2,250, on a call of subscription to capital stock to appellee by appellant.

The declaration alleges that appellee is a body corporate. That appellant, on the 6th day of February, 1875, became a subscriber for thirty shares of the capital stock of appellee; that the shares were $100 each, to be paid in.such installments as the directors of appellee might call for; and that on the 1st of September, 1875, appellee, by its directors, pursuant to its bylaws and the statute laws of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Danbury & Norwalk Railroad v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  3. Yanke v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Stone v. Great Western Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Lane v. BrainerdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beaulaurier v. Washington State Hop Producers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Fey v. Peoria Watch Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  3. Fey v. Peoria Watch Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API