In re Ledford
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this attorney grievance matter, respondent has conditionally admitted the allegations against him and consents to a public reprimand. We accept the conditional admission and publicly reprimand respondent.
Respondent admits that he failed to assist clients in negotiating a settlement from an escrow account held by him; failed to file a summons and complaint or timely return the client’s file before the statute of limitations had run; failed to timely record a property transfer; committed omissions and errors in the description and location of property in a deed and then failed to either…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re LedfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In re CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012