Legal Opinion

In re Ledford

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 19, 1994No. 24172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, respondent has conditionally admitted the allegations against him and consents to a public reprimand. We accept the conditional admission and publicly reprimand respondent.

Respondent admits that he failed to assist clients in negotiating a settlement from an escrow account held by him; failed to file a summons and complaint or timely return the client’s file before the statute of limitations had run; failed to timely record a property transfer; committed omissions and errors in the description and location of property in a deed and then failed to either…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re LedfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. In re CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API