Legal Opinion

Raney v. Raney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 7, 1927No. 8 Div. 932PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a will contest, begun in the probate court and transferred to the circuit court, under section 10636 of the Code.

The case went to the jury upon the sole question of undue influence in the procurement of the will.

In setting up undue influence as a ground of contest, it is sufficient to allege in general terms that the will was the result of undue influence of a named person or persons. Cox v. Parker, 212 Ala. 35, 101 So. 657; Grubbs v. Hawkins, 208 Ala. 349, 94 So. 484; Johnson v. Johnson, 206 Ala. 523, 91 So. 260; Strickland v. Strickland, 206 Ala. 452, 90 So. 345; Cunninghame v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. OtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Coghill v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Eastis v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Cox v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Hawthorne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bank of Red Bay v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Pruitt v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Starr v. StarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Cook v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API