Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Petrancek
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We accept the findings and recommendations of the board. We are particularly concerned that respondent should have retained his client’s funds for nine years without depositing them as required by DR 9-102(A), and that, rather than seek the appointment of a successor fiduciary, he would file with the probate court documents signed in blank by the deceased executor.
Our rules require, and clients should expect, that funds given to a lawyer will be maintained in a bank account. We do not regard money in a box under an attic floorboard as the equivalent of a bank account.
*574Just as troubling to us…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. PapckeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BandyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. PapckeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. PetrancekOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. PetrancekOhio Supreme Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.