Legal Opinion

Stuyvesant Town Corp. v. Impellitteri

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the board of estimate of the City of New York, to set aside and annul that determination, and to grant the application of petitioners to increase the maximum average basic rental per month per room to an amount sufficient to provide the sums for interest, amortization and dividends under and pursuant to the terms of the contract between petitioners and the City of New York.

The petitioners Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Stuyvesant Town Corporation entered into an agreement with the City of New…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Dorsey v. Stuyvesant Town Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M & M, INC. v. WadeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Stuyvesant Town Corp. v. ImpellitteriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API