State v. Ward

*755SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶ 64. (dissenting). I disagree with the majority opinion on two grounds:

¶ 65. First, the majority opinion errs in refusing to suppress evidence seized by law enforcement officers in the defendant's home. I conclude there is no nexus in the warrant application in this case between the defendant's home and the defendant's drug-dealing activities to establish probable cause to search the home.1

¶ 66. Second, the majority opinion errs in refusing to suppress evidence seized by law enforcement officers who failed to comply with the constitutionally based rule of…