David Pittington v. Great Smoky Mountain Lumberjack Feud
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Daughtrey) J.,
SUTTON, J. (pp. 809-12), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs who successfully prove that they were fired in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VH”) are presumptively entitled to back pay for the amount they would have earned had they not been- unlawfully terminated. Such awards are intended to compensate fully plaintiffs for the wrongs that they suffered. For the same reason, an award of prejudgment interest on the back pay owed is also nearly always appropriate. We conclude from these principles that a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Dorreon McBride v. Gregory SkipperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Tony Gunter v. Bemis Co.,Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Automotive Parts Antitrust Litig.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Robinson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Marina Debity v. Monroe Cnty. Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.