Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2008No. S055744 & S055744PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 26 (2010). See ORS 250.085(2) (specifying requirements for seeking review of certified ballot title). This court reviews the certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with ORS 250.035(2). See ORS 250.085(5) (stating standard of review). For the reasons explained below, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

Initiative Petition 26, if enacted, would add the following text to the Oregon Revised Statutes:

“No employee shall be required to pay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Caruthers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Crumpton v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De Young v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Chamberlain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API