State v. Pankey, 07 Ma 2 (6-17-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Benjamin Pankey appeals from the verdict entered in the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court finding him guilty of possession of crack cocaine. The issues on appeal concern the right to self-representation, sufficiency of the evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel in stipulating to a medical document containing an incriminating statement, and chain of custody. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
{¶ 2} On February 22, 2006, appellant's parole officer arrived at appellant's residence and witnessed a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. BradleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Pankey v. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. LynchOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. Nichols, 07 Je 50 (3-6-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.