Robeson v. International Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentSmith, Justice
Biblical incantations notwithstanding, the, doctrine- of interspousal immunity has been abandoned by an overwhelming majority of jurisdiction “with the unanimous approval of legal writers.” Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts (4th Ed.), § 122, p. 864. In my view, this court has passed up a golden opportunity to lay to rest an antiquated and thoroughly discredited common law rule.
The doctrine of interspousal immunity stems from the common law notion that “a husband and wife [are], in legal fiction, one and the same person.” Taylor v. Vezzani, 109 Ga. App. 167 (1) (135 SE2d 522) (1964). This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. StienneNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Lewis v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Courtney v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Moulton v. MoultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.