Legal Opinion

Matter of Luther Dempsey v. New York City Department of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 2015No. 59PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fahey, J.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, we hold that the respondent agency’s denial of petitioner’s application for certification as a school bus driver was not arbitrary and capricious. We conclude that Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ. (16 NY3d 309 [2011]), on which petitioner relies, is distinguishable.

L

Petitioner Luther Dempsey applied to the New York City Department of Education (DOE) in 2006 for certification as a school bus driver. He indicated that he had been employed for about two years by a private bus company, transporting preschool children.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arrocha v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Bonacorsa v. Van LindtNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Acosta v. New York City Department of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Hasberry v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  2. Coleman v. New York City Department of Education Division of Human ResourcesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Stephenson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  4. Matter of Rumley v. NYC Dept. of Educ. OPIAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Matter of Rumley v. NYC Dept. of Educ. OPIAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API