Matter of Luther Dempsey v. New York City Department of Education
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fahey, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, we hold that the respondent agency’s denial of petitioner’s application for certification as a school bus driver was not arbitrary and capricious. We conclude that Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ. (16 NY3d 309 [2011]), on which petitioner relies, is distinguishable.
L
Petitioner Luther Dempsey applied to the New York City Department of Education (DOE) in 2006 for certification as a school bus driver. He indicated that he had been employed for about two years by a private bus company, transporting preschool children.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arrocha v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bonacorsa v. Van LindtNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Acosta v. New York City Department of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hasberry v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by16 opinions
- Whitfield v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- Coleman v. New York City Department of Education Division of Human ResourcesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Stephenson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Matter of Rumley v. NYC Dept. of Educ. OPIAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Rumley v. NYC Dept. of Educ. OPIAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.