Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lincoln Memorial University

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1957PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice BueNEtt

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case under Section 50-901 et seq., T.C.A. The Chancellor granted compensation to the employee for 50% loss of the use of his right leg. The University has appealed and presents two questions to this Court, to wit:(1) Lincoln Memorial University being a charitable •educational, institution, and riot b.eing operated for a ■profit' is'"'not within the provisions of the "Workmen’s 'Compensation Law, and,(2) If the University is liable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act then the employee was a casual and not a regular employee.

These questions have been seasonably…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Caughman v. Columbia Y. M. C. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Zoulalian v. New England Sanatorium & Benevolent Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Mashburn v. Ne-Hi Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bohannon v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Save-A-Lot, Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Armstrong v. SpearsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Murray v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hendrix v. Ray-Ser Dyeing CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API