State v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Mandamus Application to the Superior Court for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to allow the relator to inspect and make copies of certain books, etc., in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court in reversing the judgment of the said Superior Court in refusing to quash the return to the alternative writ. See motion to quash the return to the alternative writ (7 Penn, 397). Refused.
Read the full summary
Mandamus Application to the Superior Court for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to allow the relator to inspect and make copies of certain books, etc., in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court in reversing the judgment of the said Superior Court in refusing to quash the return to the alternative writ. See motion to quash the return to the alternative writ (7 Penn, 397). Refused. Motion to- quash writ of error; refused, (post.) Writ of error—reversed in part and remanded. (1 Boyce, 379). Application to amend the return. Denied, (ante.)
1Opinion of the Court
Pennewill, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
The Supreme Court in reversing the court below in the above stated case, said:
“We hold that the relator is therefore entitled to the peremptory writ of mandamus of the court to which this case is remanded, to be issued by that court under such reasonable regulations as to time and place as it may direct, commanding the defendant to suffer and permit the relator, or his duly authorized attorney, to inspect and make copies of such of the books, papers and accounts and writings of the defendant mentioned in his petition, and only of such of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- State v. Sherman Oil CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1922