Miller v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Morris, Commissioner—
Affirming.
Appellant, along with Mayes and Haynes, was charged with breaking into the store of one Quinn and stealing a quantity of merchandise. When the indictment was called the commonwealth elected to try appellant. A jury returned a verdict of guilty, inflicting the minimum fixed by Kentucky Statutes, Section 1164, one year in the penitentiary. In support of motion for a new trial appellant set up seven or more grounds; most of these are abandoned on appeal here, and it is only argued the judgment should be reversed, because:(1) .The evidence was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Tarkaney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Caruth v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Robey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Anderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Long v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Scott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Hunt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.