Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matthews v. Watkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1988No. 879SC1089Published

1Dissent

Judge ORR

dissenting.

The majority fails, in my opinion, to correctly address a substantial issue raised by the petitioners and ruled upon by the trial court. In the petition it is alleged that the payment of . attorney’s fees by the executor was “wrongful and in violation of the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 28A-23-4 . . . .” That statute says:

The clerk of superior court, in his discretion, is authorized and empowered to allow counsel fees to an attorney serving as a personal representative, collector or public administrator (in addition to the commissions allowed him as such representative,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. In Re the Will of CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Lightner v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Miller v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. In Re the Estate of MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API