Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Goldstein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1969No. Appeal, 298PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

This is an appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing preliminary objections filed by one of three defendants to plaintiffs’ bill in Equity. We agree with the plaintiffs that the instant appeal must be quashed because (1) it is interlocutory and (2) it does not require an account.

Plaintiffs are building contractors who entered into a written agreement (a) with several defendants providing for the construction of a building in Radnor Township and (b) with the bank which agreed to finance the construction.

The law is well established that an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Ahrens v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Basalyga v. HohenseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Armor v. ArmorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Armor v. ArmorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Holland v. Rich, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API