Moyn v. Rose
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 367, Jan. T., 1913, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1913, No. 958, appointing a receiver on bill in equity in case of William Moyn, Jr., v. Harry M. Rose. Bill in equity for the appointment of a receiver, and for other relief. Before Mabtin, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court, on final hearing, awarded the relief prayed for. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potteb,
This was a bill in equity praying for the appointment of a receiver, and for an accounting between partners. The bill av&rred that William Moyn, J r., and Harry M. Rose, entered into a written agreement, for the purpose of forming a company for the operation of retail grocery stores. Moyn, the plaintiff, was to contribute $5,000 to the capital, and was to receive twenty-five per cent, of the profits of the business, while Rose, the defendant, was to contribute $20,000 to the capital of the concern. Plaintiff paid in his contribution to the capital as agreed, but…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Berg v. Butler Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spiese v. Mutual Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Levin v. BarishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Levin v. BarishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984