Legal Opinion

State v. Rivet

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 16, 2007No. AC 27819PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant, Ronald N. Rivet, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the element of intent. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On January 26, 2003, the defendant shot and killed James Beattie alongside Route 2 in North Stonington. The defendant had known Beattie since the 1970s, and Beattie formerly had been married to the defendant’s fiancee. The state charged the defendant with murder, but he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. GaymonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. State v. FasanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AvilesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. State v. TokConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Cator v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. State v. Ruiz-PachecoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. RivetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API