Legal Opinion

State v. Duggan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 23, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment for maintaining a common nuisance. On demurrer to pleas in abatement.

1Opinion of the CourtDubeeb, C. J.

The defendant pleads three pleas in abatement to the indictment. The first plea is, “ because one of the grand jurors who participated in the delib erations of the grand jury which has found said indictment, and who was drawn by the town council of the town of New Shoreham to serve on said grand jury, to wit, Benjamin S. Babcock, was not, at the time he was drawn as aforesaid, qualified to vote upon any proposition to impose a tax or for the expenditure of money in said New Shoreham.” The second plea, pleaded by express leave, is to the same effect, except that it applies to Isaac A. Hart,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brennan v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Hardin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Ward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Priest v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Baldwin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. United States v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. United States v. JanesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API