Legal Opinion

Bowman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1984No. 4-783A238PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Presiding Judge.

Harold E. Bowman comes before us convicted by a jury of both theft, a Class D felony (IND.CODE 85-48-4-2), and possession of a controlled substance (diazepam), a Class D felony (IND.CODE 85-48-4-7) (amended 1983 Ind.Acts, P.L. 188, § 4), for which he was sentenced to two consecutive two-year terms. He challenges the court's failure to sustain his objections to testimony and evidence at trial and the sufficiency of the evidence underlying the jury's verdict on the theft count. After a review of the record and of pertinent Indiana law, we find no error in Bowman's…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Luckett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ahmmad Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Incorporated, Steve Lindgren, Larry Williams, City of Gary, Indiana, Nakon Security, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Glispie v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Haltom v. Bruner and Meis, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Owen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Tony McMiller v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API