Legal Opinion

Sims v. Vandiver

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 27, 1987No. 85-351PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

504 So.2d 250 (1987)

Vada SIMS, Joy Brown, and Danny Stevens

v.

Clarence VANDIVER.

85-351.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 27, 1987.

R. Stephen Bolling, Muscle Shoals, for appellants.

Robert J. Harris of Munsey & Ford, Tuscumbia, for appellee.

2Per curiam

This appeal involves a boundary line dispute between coterminous owners of real property. The trial court determined the boundary line in accordance with Clarence Vandiver's claim of adverse possession. We affirm.

The common boundary line described in each party's respective deed is the East line of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 27, Township 5…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. StricklerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Reynolds v. RutlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Nelson v. GarrardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Drennen Land and Timber Co. v. AngellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bearden v. EllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Bushnell v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Doyle v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Kendrick v. KendrickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Ramsey v. O'NEALSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API