People v. Andrades
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
G.B. Smith, J.
In People v DePallo (96 NY2d 437 [2001]), we held that defense counsel properly balanced the duties he owed to his client and the duties he owed to the court and to the criminal justice system when, during a jury trial, counsel notified the court that his client had offered perjured testimony and refused to use that testimony in his closing argument to the jury. We left open the question of the propriety of a similar disclosure under circumstances where the court sits as the factfinder. We address that issue in the case now before us and hold that counsel’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. KeenNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. DePalloNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by12 opinions
- NXIVM Corp. v. O'HaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- People v. KolonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WesleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Yanique S. v. Frederick T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.