Legal Opinion

State v. Dennard

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1982No. 13465PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Defendant-respondent, Michael Dennard, was charged with statutory rape in violation of I.C. § 18-6101(1). After trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. The jury foreman in delivering the verdict informed the Court of the jury’s desire to be heard further. Granted permission, he stated:

“Your Honor, Defendant, audience in the Court, we arrive at this decision based strictly on the law, as was our duty — sworn duty to do so, but we feel in this case, that there were extenuating circumstances that somewhat should be considered in the administer [sic] and the judgment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Stockwell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. TinnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. BerlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HoisingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. LaMereIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. PrestwichIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. WatkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Twin Falls Livestock Commission Co. v. Mid-Century InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API