Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Youngblood v. Sanders

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2002No. 30785Published

1ConcurrenceDavis, Chief Justice

(Filed Dec. 5, 2002)

In this proceeding, the majority opinion has issued a writ of prohibition precluding the circuit court from disqualifying the petitioner’s defense counsel. I concur in this judgment. I write separately to clarify issues the majority opinion failed to address, but which I believe may pose potential problems in future cases for future litigants.

A. The State Did Not Have Standing to Disqualify Defense Counsel

The majority opinion assumed that the State had standing to seek to disqualify defense counsel. Consequently, the majority opinion addressed the merits of the issue…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API