Legal Opinion

Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 15, 1992No. 92-598PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial judge’s findings of fact in a nonjury trial will not be disturbed where they are supported by competent and substantial evidence even if that evidence is disputed. Antun Invests. Corp. v. Ergas, 549 So.2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ren-Del Enters., Inc. v. Florida Keys First State Bank, 539 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Competent and substantial evidence was presented that the appellant breached the roof repair contract and, for that reason, was not entitled to a judgment of foreclosure on its mechanic’s lien.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Antun Investments Corp. v. ErgasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Ren-Del Enterprises, Inc. v. FLA. KEYS FIRST STATE BANKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mazzella v. GreeneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. D & J Industries, Inc. v. Key West Beach Club Condominium Ass'n Nos. 1 & 2, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003